Read below the info on this vid – MANY documents we all know are flagged as written by A.I. – including the U.S. Declaration of Independence, US Constitution, more see below
American college student says real non-AI written papers are being flagged as written by artificial intelligence
But it’s not just systems doing it. This girls college professor read her one page essay, thought it was too grammatically correct and formal, and flagged it as AI… pic.twitter.com/XYuhTFQJEy
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) September 7, 2026
But it’s not just systems doing it. This girls college professor read her one page essay, thought it was too grammatically correct and formal, and flagged it as AI The student wanted to provide proof she personally wrote it “I’m happy to show her my Google Doc log, when it was created, and how many times it says that I edited it. I also told her… You know, I said, “I’m curious as to why you believe this paper is AI or what, if any, system flagged it as AI,” because it’s ridiculous” Even though she wrote the paper she offered to rewrite the paper and film herself writing it as proof This is ridiculous, students shouldn’t have to go to the lengths of filming themselves writing a paper to prove they aren’t using AI “She thought this was AI because it was grammatically polished” So apparently if you are smart and can write a good paper you can now be punished because it could have been ai…. This shows with technology like this, we need safeguards for people not abusing the system
These are not documents actually written by AI. They are famous human texts that popular AI detectors have repeatedly misclassified as machine-generated. The usual reason is that formal, balanced, highly edited prose looks “too predictable” to tools trained on modern, chatty writing.
1. The U.S. Declaration of Independence (1776)
This is the poster child. Multiple detectors, especially ZeroGPT, have scored Jefferson’s text at roughly 97–99% “AI-generated.” The famous opening — “When in the Course of human events…” — is tightly structured, rhetorically balanced, and almost entirely free of the messy variation detectors treat as “human.” The result is absurd on its face: the document predates electricity, let alone large language models. It became a running joke precisely because so many teachers and employers still treat those same tools as proof.
2. The U.S. Constitution
Feed the Preamble or early articles into GPTZero or ZeroGPT and you often get a verdict that the text is “likely written entirely by AI.” The Constitution’s legal cadence, repeated clauses, and low-surprise vocabulary match the statistical profile detectors associate with chatbots. GPTZero’s own creator has noted that the document appears so often in training data that models learn to generate similar language — which then makes the original look synthetic to a detector.
3. The Bible (especially Genesis)
Passages from Genesis have been scored around 88% AI-generated by ZeroGPT, and other biblical excerpts have drawn similar flags. Parallel structure, formulaic repetition (“And God said… and it was so”), and elevated diction produce the low “burstiness” detectors use as a tell. The same pattern shows up in other sacred and liturgical writing: formal rhythm gets read as machine regularity.
4. Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address (1863)
Tests have put Lincoln’s 272-word speech at 96% or even 100% AI-written. The address is short, tightly parallel (“we cannot dedicate — we cannot consecrate — we cannot hallow”), and almost perfectly paced. Detectors interpret that compression and symmetry as the opposite of human messiness. The irony is sharp: one of the most studied pieces of American oratory gets treated as if a chatbot drafted it in 1863.
5. The Texas Declaration of Independence (1836)
ZeroGPT scored the Republic of Texas founding document at about 86.5% AI-generated. Like the 1776 Declaration it echoes, it is a grievance list wrapped in 19th-century legal rhetoric. In the same test, Sam Houston’s inaugural address from the same year scored 0% AI — which only underscores how inconsistent the tools are even on contemporaneous texts. A document written two centuries before ChatGPT still trips the same “too polished” wire.
The common thread: detectors measure predictability and uniformity, not authorship. Historic documents that were drafted by committees, revised for public reading, and later copied into every textbook tend to look “artificial” to software that expects sloppy modern prose. That is a limitation of the tools, not evidence that Jefferson, Madison, or Lincoln had a chatbot.
Or….. maybe
Either the detectors are all BS, or we live in a simulation and A.I. did write them. Hmmm. Like our book – The Book of Ben. Read the beginning for free on Amazon. click the following cover –
Top Features and Vids across all Whatfinger sites right now
- EVERYTHING WOKE TURNS TO SHIT — INCLUDING MOTHERHOOD
- Michigan ROBS Western Michigan?! | Big Ten Officials EXPOSED In Clock SCANDAL!
- Farmed Fish Is Not the Health Food They Sold You
- Steve Inman Clips – Knuckle Sandwich Compilation, Animals Gone Wild III
- America Still Owns the Night. China’s ‘Area 51’ Is Trying to Steal It. Russia Is a Spectator.
- What Happens to Your Body After Years of Taking Statins?
CLICK HERE FOR COMMENTS