The Nobel Peace Prize: A Badge for Anti-American Ideologues, Not True Peacemakers – Whatfinger News' Choice Clips
Whatfinger News' Choice Clips

The Nobel Peace Prize: A Badge for Anti-American Ideologues, Not True Peacemakers

Article s below this top clip by Putin… 🛑

President Putin responds to President Trump not winning the Nobel Peace Prize: “This award lost credibility. The committee discussed the prize for people who have done nothing for the world.” “He solves complex problems, crises that last for decades.”

JUST IN: President Trump THANKS Vladimir Putin after he said the Nobel Peace Prize has “lost credibility” Putin: “There were cases when this committee discussed the Nobel Peace Prize for people who have done NOTHING for the world.” “Is the current president of the USA worthy or unworthy? I don’t know. He really does a lot to solve such complex problems, crises that last for years or even decades. He sincerely aspires for this crisis in Ukraine to be resolved.” – clip at X

The Nobel Peace Prize: A Badge for Anti-American Ideologues, Not True Peacemakers

In a candid moment captured in a recent press conference (above clip), Russian President Vladimir Putin didn’t mince words about the Nobel Peace Prize’s tarnished reputation. Responding to questions about President Donald Trump’s snub for the 2025 award, Putin remarked that the prize has “lost credibility” after being handed to individuals who “did nothing for the world.” He pointedly highlighted cases where laureates received the honor prematurely or undeservedly, while praising Trump for tackling “complex problems, crises that last for decades.” Even Putin, whose geopolitical clashes with the U.S. are well-known, acknowledged Trump’s genuine efforts toward peace, such as in the Middle East and Ukraine. This admission from an adversary underscores a harsh reality: the Nobel Peace Prize has devolved into a tool for rewarding those who detest American exceptionalism, embrace Marxist or socialist ideologies, or promote globalist agendas that undermine U.S. sovereignty.

True peacemakers like Trump, who actually end wars and broker historic deals, are systematically ignored because they don’t fit the committee’s left-wing bias. The Norwegian Nobel Committee’s decisions reveal a pattern of favoring anti-Western figures over those who strengthen America and its allies. Established in 1901 by Alfred Nobel’s will, the prize was intended to honor those who advance “fraternity between nations” and reduce standing armies. Yet, over the decades, it has become a platform for ideological signaling, often celebrating critics of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy while snubbing conservatives who deliver tangible results. Conservatives have long decried this slant, arguing that the committee—appointed by Norway’s parliament, dominated by socialist-leaning parties—prioritizes virtue-signaling over actual peace.

As Breitbart’s Joel Pollak noted, the prize has been “trash for decades,” rewarding warmongers and ideologues while overlooking real achievements like Trump’s Abraham Accords. Take Barack Obama’s 2009 award as the quintessential example of this farce. Nominated just weeks into his presidency, Obama received the prize “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” In reality, he had accomplished zilch—zero wars ended, no major treaties signed. Conservatives blasted it as a participation trophy for a socialist-leaning leader whose rhetoric appealed to European elites but whose policies later expanded drone strikes, prolonged conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, and destabilized Libya.

Trump himself ripped into Obama’s win, saying, “They gave it to Obama for doing absolutely nothing but destroying the Middle East.” Fox News commentators echoed this, calling it undeserved and a sign of the committee’s anti-American bent. Obama’s prize set the tone: the Nobel is no longer about stopping wars but about endorsing progressive globalism, even if it means honoring those who weaken U.S. interests. This bias extends to a roster of laureates who embody anti-U.S. sentiments or leftist ideologies. In 1994, the committee awarded the prize to Yasser Arafat, the Palestinian Liberation Organization leader labeled a terrorist by many for his role in attacks against Israel and support for anti-Western militants.

Arafat’s Marxist-inspired PLO aligned with Soviet-backed groups, yet he shared the honor with Israeli leaders Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres— a move conservatives saw as moral equivalence that rewarded violence against America’s ally. Similarly, in 1982, Rigoberta Menchú won for her advocacy on indigenous rights in Guatemala, but her autobiography was later exposed as containing fabrications, and her ties to Marxist guerrillas raised questions about her anti-capitalist agenda. The socialist tilt is even more evident in awards to figures like Le Duc Tho in 1973, a North Vietnamese communist negotiator who rejected the prize but was honored alongside Henry Kissinger for Vietnam “peace” talks that led to Hanoi’s victory and the fall of Saigon—a disaster for U.S. prestige. Jimmy Carter’s 2002 win came after years of criticizing U.S. policies, including his post-presidency meddling in foreign affairs that conservatives viewed as undermining American leadership.

President Trump correctly calls out Barack Obama for getting the Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing. Obama got it for his identity. That’s it. He was a terrible POTUS. Only person worse was Joe Biden. That’s why America was such a mess as Trump took over.

Al Gore’s 2007 prize for climate activism promoted a socialist-leaning environmental agenda that conservatives argue hampers U.S. energy independence. More recently, the 2022 award went to groups in Ukraine and Russia opposing Putin’s invasion, but conservatives point out the committee’s reluctance to honor pro-Western, anti-communist efforts. Contrast this with Trump’s record, which screams “peacemaker” but earns crickets from Oslo. During his first term, Trump brokered the Abraham Accords, normalizing relations between Israel and several Arab nations without a single U.S. soldier lost in new wars—a feat conservatives hail as deserving the Nobel. He was nominated multiple times, including by Norwegian lawmakers, but ignored. In 2025, Trump ended eight wars, including historic cease-fires in Gaza and Ukraine, yet the prize went to Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado—a worthy anti-socialist fighter, but one whose award conservatives see as another snub to Trump.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Trump was denied despite his unparalleled achievements, with the White House slamming the committee for putting “politics over peace.” Lawmakers and world leaders have rallied for Trump. Rep. Andy Barr (R-KY) nominated him, citing his “extraordinary record of peacemaking.” Israeli hostage families urged the committee to award Trump, chanting his name in celebrations across Gaza and Israel. Even Hillary Clinton said she’d nominate him if he ends the Russia-Ukraine war—though Trump quipped he might take her up on it. Senators like Bernie Moreno (R-OH) and Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL) pushed resolutions, with Fine suggesting renaming the prize after Trump. The Republican Jewish Coalition echoed this, saying Trump “shouldn’t just win the Nobel Prize, it should be renamed after him.”

Why the snub? The committee’s chair, Jørgen Watne Frydnes, awkwardly justified it by claiming they focus on “long-term efforts,” but conservatives see it as ideological gatekeeping. The Federalist has argued the prize committee considered dictators like Mussolini and Stalin but not Trump, highlighting its leftist bias. Townhall columnists note the award crowns chaos over stability, favoring those who align with socialist Norway’s worldview. As The Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro put it, compare Obama’s legacy of division to Trump’s peace deals—you decide who deserves it. Putin’s critique resonates because it exposes the hypocrisy: a prize meant for peace now props up anti-U.S. narratives. Trump values saving lives over accolades, but his exclusion proves the Nobel is a club for Marxists and America-haters. Until the committee sheds its bias, it will remain a joke, as even adversaries like Putin agree.

Links

Ben and Mal Antoni at Whatfinger News. Heavy use of Gateway Pundit links above…

More….

Powerful from President Trump: “Everyone says that I should get the Nobel Prize — but for me, the real prize will be the sons and daughters who live to grow up because millions of people are no longer being killed in endless wars.”

CLICK HERE FOR COMMENTS

Watch MAGA made this Whatfinger commercial, pretty cool huh!

Sponsored