Brandon Tatum’s Push Against Tucker Carlson: A Clash with Charlie Kirk’s Unyielding Stance

• How can you move your 401K to Gold penalty free? Get the answer and more with Goldco’s exclusive Gold IRA Beginner’s Guide. Click here now! – Goldco

In a recent YouTube appearance, he praised Israel’s actions in Gaza and even suggested they should have pursued more aggressive measures years ago, framing such positions as aligned with conservative values. The flashpoint intensified around TPUSA’s annual America Fest event. Prior to his death, Kirk faced immense pressure from wealthy Jewish donors to exclude Carlson from the lineup. Leaked text messages, published by fellow conservative Candace Owens, revealed Kirk’s frustration: he lamented losing millions in annual funding but declared he “cannot and will not be bullied like this.” Kirk even contemplated stepping away from pro-Israel advocacy altogether, highlighting his commitment to free speech and ideological independence. Despite the financial hit—estimated at $2 million yearly from one donor alone—Kirk stood firm, inviting Carlson and defending the decision as essential to TPUSA’s mission of fostering open dialogue among conservatives.

Kirk’s assassination, occurring amid rising political tensions, has only amplified these debates. In the aftermath, figures like Tatum have stepped forward to influence TPUSA’s direction under new leadership, often referred to as “Erica” in internal discussions. Tatum publicly stated his support for the organization but conditioned it on severing ties with Carlson, whom he labeled as promoting anti-Semitism. To underscore his point, Tatum dangled a significant incentive: a potential $1 million donation, including $500,000 from a personal contact, if TPUSA aligns with his vision by barring Carlson from future events. This move, captured in social media posts and analyzed in conservative commentary, positions Tatum as a gatekeeper seeking to realign TPUSA with a more uncompromising pro-Israel stance. Critics within the conservative sphere, including media analyst Mark Dice, have sharply rebuked Tatum’s approach. In a widely viewed YouTube video, Dice portrays Tatum—alongside others like Laura Loomer and Josh Hammer—as “sharks” circling TPUSA to reshape it in their image, directly contradicting Kirk’s principles.

• The Truth About Weight Loss After 40 – Wellness Can Help You – Sponsor

Dice highlights Kirk’s leaked messages as evidence of his resolve, noting how Kirk vented about donors playing into stereotypes and his refusal to be emotionally blackmailed. Audio clips from Kirk further illustrate his exasperation with demands for unconditional support of Israel, particularly among younger generations showing “Israel fatigue.” Dice argues that Tatum’s conditional donation echoes the very donor pressure Kirk resisted, potentially eroding the organization’s independence. This isn’t Tatum’s first brush with internal conservative strife. His podcast episodes often feature fiery takedowns of perceived threats to the movement, including critiques of figures like Don Lemon and Ilhan Omar for their “white supremacy” narratives.

Yet, in the context of Carlson, Tatum’s position aligns him with a faction that sees Carlson’s theological and foreign policy critiques as beyond the pale. For instance, Loomer has branded Carlson a “lunatic” and “demonic” for biblical references at Kirk’s memorial, while Hammer, a Newsweek editor, called him the “most dangerous anti-Semite in America.” These accusations stem from Carlson’s eulogy for Kirk, where he likened the activist’s fate to Jesus Christ’s, suggesting powerful interests silenced him for speaking truth—a narrative some interpret as invoking antisemitic tropes, though defenders like Jewish entrepreneur David Sacks insist Carlson harbors no such biases. Carlson, often hailed as a MAGA patriot for his role in amplifying Trump-era populism, has defended his views by drawing on historical figures like Martin Luther and Billy Graham. In private conversations revealed through Nixon tapes, Graham admitted concealing his concerns about secular liberal influences, a point Carlson uses to argue for candid discourse. At Kirk’s funeral, Carlson’s remarks emphasized Kirk as a “Christian evangelist” whose mission clashed with those in power, evoking biblical themes without explicit ethnic targeting.

• Facebook doesn’t want you reading most sites we link to or any vids or features that we post. Their algorithm hides our pages and humor too as best it can. The way to stick it to Zuckerberg? Sign up for our once-a-day newsletter. Takes 6 seconds. We send out the best – most popular links daily, no spam, plus a splash of honesty even beyond Whatfinger’s homepage…. – CLICK HERE 

Nonetheless, the backlash has been swift, with organizations like the Anti-Defamation League criticizing the implications. Tatum’s efforts reflect broader tensions in conservatism: the balance between unwavering alliances and intellectual freedom. Kirk’s legacy, as seen through his final actions, leaned toward the latter. He broadened the GOP’s tent, creating space for young Black conservatives like Tatum himself, who credits events like the Young Black Leadership Summit for his rise. Kirk’s interviews, including a final one with Carlson, discussed economic anxieties among youth, comparing Trump’s appeal to other populist figures and underscoring the need for radical solutions to issues like debt and workforce shifts.

Yet, Tatum’s campaign against Carlson risks fracturing this unity. Social media posts from Tatum highlight his clashes with leftist critics, but his intra-party pushes have drawn pushback. One X post from a supporter captures Tatum’s intensity during Kirk’s assassination news, praising him as representing “a metric SHIT TON of Conservative black men.” Another video shows Tatum debating comedian Dave Smith on Kirk’s Israel support, revealing the depth of these divides.

As TPUSA evolves and grows in its post-Kirk era, Tatum’s actions ask a pivotal question: Will the organization honor Kirk’s defiance against donor bullying, or pivot toward stricter ideological boundaries? Tatum, with his platform and resources, wields significant influence, but critics argue his fight against Carlson betrays the very independence Kirk championed. In a movement built on resisting external control, this internal battle could define conservatism’s future trajectory.