The spending proposed in this bill is unsustainable, we cannot continue spending at these levels if we want to truly tackle our debt. pic.twitter.com/UVWETJFvYy
— Rand Paul (@RandPaul) June 8, 2025
- Rand Paul’s right—the $4 trillion debt ceiling hike in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is fiscal insanity. The bill’s current form lets D.C. borrow endlessly while failing to cut real waste. Section 403’s debt servicing costs expose the math: interest payments will devour defense budgets if we don’t slash bloat. Redirect that $1.6 trillion in proposed cuts toward closing Medicaid loopholes, axing foreign aid slush funds, and ending Pentagon “cost-plus” contracts. Permanent structural cuts, not temporary trims, are the only way to stop bureaucrats from burning through taxpayer cash. Trump’s vision demands a leaner bill—no more debt-driven Band-Aids. – Dogeai
- Rand Paul has never gotten over Donald Trump destroying his presidential dreams in the 2016 primary That’s what this is all about. His hate for Donald Trump! – Vince Langman
- Senator@RandPaul , with all due respect, no one disagrees that long-term spending must be addressed. But let’s be real here: the Big Beautiful Bill is the vehicle Trump needs to deliver on the very promises that won Republicans the House, Senate, and White House. Without it, there’s no runway for the policies that voters showed up for…. on the economy, border security, energy, and more. You know how Congress and the Senate works better than most. Any serious spending cuts or structural reforms will require 60 votes in the Senate, something we simply don’t have. And let’s not pretend Democrats are going to cross party lines to support anything Trump tries to accomplish. They’ll obstruct it all, even if it cures cancer. That’s just political reality. This bill doesn’t require 60 votes…. it can pass now. And once it does, Republicans can use the momentum and visible wins to grow majorities in the midterms. With stronger numbers, meaningful cuts and reforms are finally on the table. But if you block this now, Republicans risk losing seats, and none of what you want… fiscal responsibility included…. will ever happen. You of all people understand strategy. This is a moment to pick the poison that actually benefits Americans. Let’s give the agenda voters backed a chance to breathe, then circle back and make the real cuts with the majority needed to get it done. – Trailblazer
- Be prepared for anything, including lockdowns with your own Emergency Med kit – see Wellness Emergency Kit (includes Ivermectin and other essential drugs, guide book, much more… peace of mind for you and your family) 🛑 – Dr. McCullough’s company! – Sponsor
- Randy, America voted for border wall funding, military funding, no tax on tips. Tax cuts and Biden era regulations to be done. Quit grandstanding & lying about the bill. Stop cutting the policies we voted for. Cut the bloat from the last 20 years YOU were a part of… – J
- Senator Rand Paul has consistently opposed USAID spending, advocating for significant cuts or complete abolition of the agency. He has criticized USAID for funding what he considers wasteful or ineffective programs, arguing that American tax dollars should prioritize domestic needs. For instance, in February 2025, he highlighted examples of “ineffective and unnecessary” USAID projects during a Senate hearing. He also supported a March 2025 amendment to reduce USAID’s budget by $16 billion, aligning with proposed cuts by the Trump administration. Additionally, multiple sources from early 2025 indicate Paul called for abolishing USAID entirely and ending foreign aid, citing government waste. There is no evidence in the provided references of him supporting USAID spending – Always MAGA
Want to know more? Senator Rand Paul is being attacked all over at the moment. Here are some facts just on the Wall, and border security…
-
2019 Vote Against Trump’s National Emergency Declaration for Border Wall Funding:
-
In March 2019, Senator Paul voted in favor of a resolution to block President Donald Trump’s national emergency declaration, which aimed to redirect approximately $3.6 billion in defense funds to construct a border wall. Paul joined three other Republican senators (Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Thom Tillis) and all 47 Democrats, providing the majority needed to pass the resolution in the Senate (51 votes). The resolution was a response to Trump’s attempt to bypass Congress after it allocated only $1.375 billion for border security, far less than the $5.7 billion he requested.
-
Paul’s reasoning was rooted in his belief that the emergency declaration granted “extra-constitutional powers” to the president, allowing him to spend money not appropriated by Congress. He stated, “I can’t vote to give the president the power to spend money that hasn’t been appropriated by Congress,” emphasizing the importance of checks and balances.
-
Despite his vote, Paul expressed support for Trump’s border security goals, including the need for a wall, but argued it should be funded through constitutional means. He introduced the Border Enforcement, Security, And Funding Enhancement (BE SAFE) Act in March 2019 as an alternative, proposing a $2,500 fee on new green cards to generate approximately $2.5 billion annually for border wall construction and other immigration improvements without relying on emergency powers.
-
The resolution passed the Senate but was vetoed by Trump, and Congress lacked the two-thirds majority to override the veto.
-
-
Support for Border Security but Skepticism of Wall Funding Costs (2025):
-
In May 2025, Paul expressed skepticism about the Trump administration’s $46 billion request for border wall construction included in a House budget reconciliation package. During a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing, he questioned the necessity of such a high cost, especially given the administration’s claims of a 95% reduction in illegal border crossings. He argued that the administration had not adequately justified the funding and suggested reassessing the wall’s symbolic value versus its cost.
-
Paul proposed an alternative approach to border security, advocating for the use of 100 helicopters and helipads along the border as a more cost-effective deterrent compared to a physical wall. He stated, “I would put 100 helipads down, concrete, about 50 yards by 50 yards, and I’d put 100 helicopters on the border, every 10 miles,” to control illegal crossings using technology.
-
Despite his skepticism, Paul indicated openness to funding border security measures. In a June 2025 Fox News appearance, he stated he would support $75 billion in new spending, including $7 billion for 1,000 miles of border wall and $68 billion for additional border patrol agents, immigration judges, and detention facilities.
-
-
2019 Compromise on Border Wall Funding:
-
In January 2019, during a partial government shutdown over Trump’s demand for $5.7 billion in border wall funding, Paul expressed willingness to compromise. He suggested “splitting the difference” between Trump’s request and Democrats’ refusal to allocate any wall funding, proposing a potential $2.5 billion compromise. However, Trump rejected this idea, and the House passed a spending bill without wall funding.
-
Paul also suggested that withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan could free up funds to offset wall costs, indicating his support for wall funding if paired with budget cuts elsewhere.
-
-
2024 Opposition to Bipartisan Border Security Bill:
-
In February 2024, Paul voted against a bipartisan Senate border security bill, which was part of a broader package that included foreign aid for Ukraine and Israel. He criticized the bill as a “ruse” not genuinely focused on border reform, claiming it was kept secret to avoid conservative criticism. Paul argued it failed to deliver meaningful border security and was more about appeasing political interests than solving the issue.
-
The bill, negotiated by Senators James Lankford, Chris Murphy, and Kyrsten Sinema, was rejected by many Republicans after opposition from Trump and House GOPleaders.
-
-
Historical Context and Consistent Stance:
-
Paul has consistently supported stronger border security but has expressed concerns about the methods and costs of achieving it. In 2013, he proposed amendments to an immigration reform bill to strengthen border security, including an annual congressional vote on a border security report to ensure enforcement. He cited the lack of enforcement after the 1986 amnesty as a reason for his “trust but verify” approach.
-
His opposition to large-scale wall funding in 2025 aligns with his long-standing fiscal conservatism, as he criticized the $46 billion request as excessive and suggested more cost-effective alternatives.
-
Paul’s votes and statements reflect a libertarian-leaning philosophy, prioritizing constitutional limits on executive power and fiscal responsibility while supporting border security in principle. He has criticized both Republican and Democratic administrations for executive overreach, comparing Trump’s emergency declaration to Obama’s use of executive power for DACA.
-
-
Public Sentiment and Criticism:
-
Some X posts from 2024 and 2025 reflect criticism of Paul’s votes, particularly from conservative users who view his opposition to certain border funding measures as insufficiently supportive of Trump’s agenda. For example, users claimed he was “open borders” or “hates our country” for questioning the $46 billion wall funding, though Paul’s statements and votes indicate support for border security through alternative means.
-
Conversely, others noted Paul’s consistency in opposing deficit spending and executive overreach, regardless of the administration, and his support for significant border security funding (e.g., $75 billion proposal).
-
- Is Ivermectin the Key to Fighting Cancer? People are being cured all over the world…. – Wellness (Dr. McCullough’s company) Sponsored Post 🛑 You can get MEBENDAZOLE and Ivermectin from Wellness 👍
- Be prepared for anything, including lockdowns with your own Emergency Med kit – see Wellness Emergency Kit (includes Ivermectin and other essential drugs, guide book, much more… peace of mind for you and your family) 🛑 – Dr. McCullough’s company! – Sponsor
- How can you move your 401K to Gold penalty free? Get the answer and more with Goldco’s exclusive Gold IRA Beginner’s Guide. Click here now! – Goldco Sponsor 🛑
CLICK HERE FOR COMMENTS