Since President Trump Signed an EO stopping payments to the terrorists in Afghanistan, why are we still paying them 40 million a week? – Whatfinger News' Choice Clips
Whatfinger News' Choice Clips

Since President Trump Signed an EO stopping payments to the terrorists in Afghanistan, why are we still paying them 40 million a week?

Lara Logan says: Didn’t Pres Trump sign an Executive Order stopping these payments immediately after he got to office? If so, those who continued to send this money violated the President’s EO & should be investigated/charged with sedition for undermining his orders.  Post at X  – well – first off there is no EO stopping the funding of the terrorists in Afghanistan.  See details below Deep State tool Thune’s pic…

Here are some facts on American money STILL paying terrorists.

The figure referenced in Lara Logan’s X post (and the quoted post from @GuntherEagleman) stems from a long-standing controversy over UN cash shipments to Afghanistan, not direct U.S. government payments to the Taliban. Since the 2021 U.S. withdrawal, the United Nations has flown in approximately $40 million in physical U.S. dollars weekly (totaling over $2.9 billion by early 2024) to fund humanitarian operations in a country where banking infrastructure is severely limited. These funds, sourced partly from U.S. contributions to the UN, are deposited into a private Afghan bank and disbursed to aid organizations like the World Food Programme (WFP) for essentials such as food, healthcare, and malnutrition treatment. However, reports from the U.S. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) and others indicate that some portion ends up benefiting the Taliban indirectly—through taxes (e.g., ~$10 million annually admitted by former Secretary Blinken), skimming during delivery oversight, hiring demands, or deposits into the Taliban-controlled central bank.

This is not a direct “payment to the Taliban” but a byproduct of delivering aid in a Taliban-controlled environment, where over half of Afghanistan’s 40 million people rely on international support to avoid famine and collapse. Critics like Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) have amplified the claim to push for cuts, arguing it funds terrorism (the Taliban is a U.S.-designated terrorist group).Trump’s 2025 Aid Restrictions and Their ImpactPresident Trump’s second-term executive orders (e.g., EO 14169, signed January 20, 2025) imposed a 90-day freeze on all U.S. foreign aid for review, followed by the termination of 83% of USAID programs (over 5,200 contracts worth tens of billions globally). This was explicitly aimed at “wasteful” spending and ensuring alignment with U.S. interests, including curbing funds that could reach terrorists. For Afghanistan:

  • Direct U.S. aid slashed: From $736 million in 2024 to just $206 million so far in 2025, with $562 million in pending contracts canceled by April (e.g., WFP food aid for 12 million people, maternal/child health programs). Total cuts exceeded $1.3 billion across multiple countries, including Afghanistan.
  • Broader effects: Secret girls’ schools, midwifery programs, flood repairs, and university scholarships halted; malnutrition deaths rose (e.g., CNN reported child fatalities in July 2025 wards). The Lancet estimates 14 million excess deaths over five years from these cuts.
  • UN cash shipments: These have not been fully stopped because they are UN-managed, not unilateral U.S. transfers. The U.S. provides ~40% of global humanitarian funding, so cuts reduce the pool, but the UN continues operations with remaining donor funds (e.g., from Europe, though many like the UK and Germany also cut back). As of November 2025, weekly flights persist at a reduced scale to stabilize the economy and prevent total collapse, which could trigger refugee waves or terrorism spikes.

In short, the U.S. is no longer funding the full $40 million weekly—Trump’s restrictions have gutted its contribution—but residual UN flows continue, with Taliban leakage as a persistent issue.Why Are These Payments Still Happening Despite Restrictions?Several factors explain why the cash shipments haven’t been entirely halted, even under Trump’s aggressive cuts:

  1. Humanitarian Imperative and Global Coordination: Abruptly ending all aid risks mass starvation (23 million Afghans need it annually) and regional instability. The UN’s 2025 appeal is $2.4 billion; stopping U.S. input doesn’t end the program but forces reliance on others. Aid groups argue the Taliban “tax” is unavoidable in occupied territory, but alternatives (e.g., in-kind goods like food) are costlier and less efficient.
  2. Congressional and Legal Hurdles: Rep. Burchett’s “No Tax Dollars for Terrorists Act” passed the House in June 2025 but stalled in the Senate (under
    @LeaderJohnThune

    , as Logan references). A rescission bill to claw back Biden-era funds sits idle. Lara’s post calls for investigating/charging aid officials for “sedition” if they bypassed Trump’s EO, but replies (e.g., from

    @TPASarah

    ) note no such EO exists for these UN funds—they tie to the 2020 Doha Agreement (signed by Trump), which Trump hasn’t revoked. Enforcing a full stop requires new legislation, which Senate Republicans haven’t prioritized amid internal divisions.

  3. Economic Stabilization Trade-Off: The $40 million weekly has propped up the Afghan currency (making it the world’s top performer post-2021) and prevented banking collapse. SIGAR and CSIS reports warn that suspension could crumble the Taliban within a year but would devastate civilians first, outsourcing more burden to the regime and potentially boosting extremism. Trump’s team (e.g., Marco Rubio) emphasizes “efficient” aid but hasn’t targeted UN mechanisms directly.
  4. Political and Diplomatic Realities: Trump’s focus is on U.S. security (e.g., demanding Bagram base access, repatriating equipment). Aid cuts pressure the Taliban via sanctions and isolation, but full cutoff could backfire by radicalizing the population. As one expert noted, it’s a “dilemma”: aid props up the regime indirectly but averts worse chaos.
Aspect
Pre-2025 (Biden Era)
Post-Trump Restrictions (2025)
U.S. Annual Aid to Afghanistan
~$736 million (largest donor)
~$206 million (slashed 70%+)
UN Cash Shipments
$40M/week (U.S. funds ~40%)
Reduced scale; continues via other donors
Taliban Benefit
Indirect (~$10M/year taxes + skimming)
Same mechanisms, but less total volume
Human Impact
Prevented famine for 15M+
Rising malnutrition; 14M projected deaths over 5 years
Legislative Push
Burchett bill blocked in Senate
House-passed; Senate inaction criticized

Bottom Line

Trump’s restrictions have dramatically reduced U.S. involvement, but the “$40 million a week” persists at a diminished level through UN channels because stopping it cold turkey would exacerbate a humanitarian catastrophe without congressional buy-in to seal the loopholes. Logan’s frustration echoes widespread MAGA calls for accountability (e.g., firing USAID officials, enforcing the Doha deal), but as replies to her post highlight, it’s tied to systemic issues predating Trump. If Burchett’s bill advances or Trump issues a targeted EO, this could end—but as of November 29, 2025, it’s a messy holdover from years of aid dependency. For updates, track SIGAR reports or Burchett’s office. – Grok
More
Even after an attack on US soldiers by an Afghan terrorist, your tax dollars are still going to the Afghan Taliban. Our bill to Defund the Taliban has been stalled in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee since June 23, 2025.

Happy Thanksgiving Fam! I’m here to help you skip the scramble-gift-buying struggle this year for the holidays. Thousands of you are already customers of The Wellness Company, and you know they are NOT big on promotional sales…. EXCEPT once a year for Black Friday. Literally, it’s the only major sale they have annually.

Today Nov 28th, through Sunday Nov 30th, you can get those stocking stuffers for family and friends like SMILE an amazing gum regeneration peptide toothpaste, Ivermectin, Ultimate Spike Detox, Recharge, Mars, Venus, Roots, Appetite, Bison Trifecta, Therablue, Parasite Cleanse and the list goes on…… all of these products are 25% off! (Don’t want to say just supplements and RX are 25% off because it’s too vague. The names of our products are very strong and enticing. Naming them is more powerful than just a passive “here’s the sale offer”)  
Emergency Kits and Memberships are 20% off!
Give the gift of wellness to the people you love and care for. Especially those who need the nudge to take better care of themselves. OR, if you just want to stock up for the next few months and save on your favorite TWC products, now’s the time.

 







CLICK HERE FOR COMMENTS

Latest Posts

Watch MAGA made this Whatfinger commercial, pretty cool huh!