DOJ Strikes Again: Trump Administration Targets California’s Redistricting Power Grab

In a bold move that’s scaring the hell out of Newscum in California, the Trump Department of Justice has filed suit against California to halt Governor Gavin Newsom’s controversial redistricting plan. As reported by conservative journalist Nick Sortor on X (post is above), the DOJ is accusing the state of orchestrating a “brazen power grab” aimed at eliminating Republican representatives through manipulated congressional maps. Attorney General Pam Bondi didn’t mince words, stating that Newsom’s scheme “tramples on civil rights and mocks the democratic process.” This latest legal salvo, announced on November 13, 2025, underscores the escalating tensions between the federal government and California’s liberal leadership, marking yet another instance where the DOJ has stepped in to challenge what conservatives view as unconstitutional overreach by the Golden State.

The lawsuit centers on Proposition 50, a ballot measure pushed by Newsom and approved by voters earlier this month. The plan redraws congressional districts in a way that critics argue favors Democrats by racially gerrymandering lines to boost Hispanic voter influence as a proxy for partisan gain. The DOJ’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, alleges violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Bondi emphasized that “race cannot be used as a proxy to advance political interests,” highlighting how the legislature’s focus on Latino demographics dominated the map-drawing process. This action comes on the heels of similar redistricting efforts in Republican-led states like Texas, but conservatives argue California’s version crosses into illegal territory by prioritizing racial quotas over fair representation.

Newsom, ever the defiant progressive, has dismissed the suit as sour grapes from “losers” who couldn’t win at the ballot box, but Republicans see it as essential to preventing one-party dominance in a state already plagued by what they call electoral manipulation. This redistricting battle is no isolated incident. Since President Donald Trump reclaimed the White House in January 2025, his administration has launched multiple lawsuits against California, targeting policies that conservatives decry as radical, discriminatory, and in flagrant violation of federal law. Under Newsom’s governance, the state has positioned itself as a bastion of progressive resistance, but the DOJ’s aggressive enforcement has exposed what many on the right view as hypocritical and unlawful agendas. From voting integrity to gender policies, these suits reflect a concerted effort to rein in California’s excesses and restore adherence to constitutional principles.

Let’s break down the key actions taken by the DOJ over these past months, drawing from conservative reporting that highlights the administration’s commitment to accountability. First, in June 2025, the DOJ sued the Orange County Registrar of Voters, Robert Page, for obstructing federal efforts to ensure election integrity. The lawsuit accused Page of redacting critical identifying information from records of voters removed for noncitizenship, violating the Help America Vote Act and the National Voter Registration Act.

• How can you move your 401K to Gold penalty free? Get the answer and more with Goldco’s exclusive Gold IRA Beginner’s Guide. Click here now! – Goldco

This stemmed from President Trump’s executive order mandating proof of citizenship for voter registration, amid concerns over noncitizen voting in deep-blue areas. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon stressed that noncitizen voting is a federal crime and that transparent voter rolls are vital for fair elections. Conservatives hailed this as a necessary strike against potential fraud, especially after reports of undocumented immigrants receiving mail-in ballots. While the suit targeted a county official, it sent a clear message to Newsom’s administration about federal oversight on California’s lax voting practices, which have long been criticized for enabling irregularities.

Just a month later, in July 2025, the DOJ escalated its offensive by suing the California Department of Education and the California Interscholastic Federation over the state’s transgender athlete policies. The complaint alleged violations of Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in education, by allowing biological males to compete in girls’ sports based on gender identity. This policy, enacted in 2013 under Newsom’s watch, has led to female athletes being displaced from podiums, losing scholarships, and facing unfair competition due to inherent physiological advantages. Attorney General Bondi pointed out Newsom’s own admission that such arrangements are “deeply unfair,” yet the state persisted, ignoring a Department of Education resolution agreement demanding compliance.

• Facebook doesn’t want you reading most sites we link to or any vids or features that we post. Their algorithm hides our pages and humor too as best it can. The way to stick it to Zuckerberg? Sign up for our 3x a week newsletter. Takes 6 seconds. We send out the best – most popular links daily, no spam, plus a splash of honesty even beyond Whatfinger’s homepage…. – CLICK HERE 
  

Trump himself vowed legal action back in August, calling it a necessary check on Democratic overreach. With Republicans holding a slim House majority, blocking California’s map could preserve GOP seats and prevent what Breitbart described as a “Democrat power grab.” Critics on the left decry these suits as partisan vendettas, but from a conservative lens, they’re essential corrections to a state that’s drifted too far from American values. Newsom’s administration has spent millions defending these policies, diverting resources from pressing issues like homelessness and crime. As the cases unfold, they could force California to realign with federal standards or face financial penalties. With more potential clashes on the horizon—such as renewed fights over immigration enforcement—the Trump DOJ shows no signs of backing down. This ongoing legal warfare highlights the deep ideological divide, but for conservatives, it’s a welcome return to law and order after years of perceived federal weakness.

Summing it all up: the DOJ’s suits since January 2025 include:

Research Links