The Unstoppable Axis: How a Russia-China Mutual Defense Pact Spells Doom for the U.S. and Its Allies – Whatfinger News' Choice Clips
Whatfinger News' Choice Clips

The Unstoppable Axis: How a Russia-China Mutual Defense Pact Spells Doom for the U.S. and Its Allies

In a world teetering on the brink of global conflict, the deepening ties between Russia and China represent a nightmare scenario for the United States and its NATO allies. Recent joint statements and military cooperation agreements, such as the May 2025 declaration on global strategic stability signed by Presidents Putin and Xi, have fueled speculation about a formal mutual defense pact. While not yet an official alliance like NATO’s Article 5, their “no-limits” partnership—bolstered by trade deals, joint exercises, and shared opposition to U.S. hegemony—could evolve into one, especially amid escalating tensions over Ukraine, Taiwan, and the Arctic. If formalized, this pact would create an unbeatable Eurasian superpower bloc capable of overwhelming the West through sheer scale, resources, and strategic depth. As one analyst put it, Russia has virtually unlimited natural resources, from oil and gas to rare earth minerals, while China boasts a population four times that of the U.S., providing an inexhaustible manpower pool.

Add Russia’s nuclear shield, which ensures mutual assured destruction (MAD) and deters nuclear escalation, and the conflict defaults to conventional warfare—where the U.S. and its allies stand little chance against a combined Russo-Chinese force. The nuclear dimension is key to understanding why this war would remain conventional. Russia’s arsenal, estimated at 4,309 warheads in 2025, includes advanced hypersonic delivery systems that outpace U.S. defenses. In other words, as Trump says ‘Nuclear War is unwinnable’. Which means this would be conventional, and there is the problem folks.  Under the extended New START treaty, both the U.S. and Russia cap deployed warheads at 1,550, but Russia’s modernization efforts—despite delays—maintain a credible second-strike capability.

China, rapidly expanding its stockpile, is projected to double its warheads by 2030, further complicating U.S. strategy. Neither side wants nuclear Armageddon; as Putin reiterated in September 2025, Russia seeks to avoid a strategic arms race but will adhere to limits for stability. This MAD equilibrium forces any confrontation into the conventional realm, where numbers and sustainability win wars. Current military statistics paint a grim picture for the West. According to 2025 Global Firepower rankings, the U.S. holds the top spot individually, followed by Russia and China. But in an alliance scenario, the scales tip dramatically. Let’s break it down as we must also understand that China can have a 100-million-man army in just a few years if needed. Keep that in mind, these figures are just as of now on September 24. 2025.

China’s population advantage—over four times the U.S.’s 342 million—allows for massive mobilization. In a protracted war, China could field tens of millions more troops annually, overwhelming Western forces through attrition
Russia’s vast land army, honed in Ukraine, combined with China’s modernizing forces, would dominate Eurasian battlefields. Russia’s “unlimited” resources—endless Siberian oil, metals, and timber—ensure sustained production, while U.S. supply chains falter in prolonged conflicts.

China’s navy, the world’s largest by hull count, controls vital sea lanes, while Russia’s submarine fleet threatens Atlantic convoys. In a two-front war, U.S. forces would be stretched thin. Financially, the combined defense budgets of Russia ($126B) and China ($267B) approach $393B, rivaling the U.S.’s $895B but with lower costs and domestic production advantages. Russia’s resource self-sufficiency and China’s manufacturing prowess mean they can outlast Western sanctions, as seen in Ukraine. Hypothetical scenarios underscore the peril. In a RAND study on protracted U.S.-China wars, outcomes favor China in drawn-out conflicts due to proximity and reserves. A NATO-Russia clash sees NATO’s numerical edge eroded by Russia’s artillery dominance and hybrid tactics. Combined, as in a “War of 2026” simulation, Russia and China exploit multi-theater attacks, from the Pacific to Europe, fragmenting U.S. alliances. Iran’s and North Korea’s involvement, via Russia’s partnerships, adds proxy fronts. The U.S. has no chance in such a conventional slugfest. Overextended globally, with aging equipment and recruitment shortfalls, America relies on technology—but quantity has a quality of its own.

Russia’s resources fuel endless war machines, China’s masses provide cannon fodder, and their pact neutralizes nuclear options. The West’s destruction wouldn’t come from a single battle but from exhaustion, economic collapse, and internal division. To avert this, diplomacy is essential—but with the pact looming, time is running out.

In a conventional war, a combined Russia and China will overtake a weak Europe, leaving the U.S. to prepare for actual invasion years into any conflict with these powers. This is not where we want to be in the world. Not with a traitorous Democrat Party and RINO low lifes who have allowed China to steal our tech for decades, which now has them ahead in many areas. Not with weak allies who are run by actual Marxists right now, like the UK, with a leader named Starmer who was part of Communist organizations, and admitted.  The U.S. stands almost alone folks. It would be wise to STOP POKING THE BEAR.  At all costs, STOP POKING THE BEAR. If they form a mutual defense pact, and China moves on Taiwan as expected in the next few years, how would we defend Taiwan? That nation as of now supplies the world with 100% of the semiconductors on Earth.  so again, STOP POKING THE BEAR. 

Links

Mal Antoni and Sgt Pat at Whatfinger News, heavy use of PDF’s above

More

It’s important to visualise the scale of Russian and American military power. Both powers dominate each other in certain areas of the battlefield. But it’s Russia that now has the vastly superior battlefield experience. Ironically, because of a War engineered by the US.


For HOURS of fun – Steve Inman as well as other humor, quick smile clips , more – Whatfinger’s collection


CLICK HERE FOR COMMENTS

Texas DPS Takes Down Human Smuggler After Wild High Speed Chase [WATCH]  Life Zette

Today’s IQ Test: Which Is Cheaper To Produce Electricity, Wind/Solar Or Fossil Fuels?Watts Up With That 👍

Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Responds to Islamic Ideology Blindfolded, With Both Hands Tied Behind Their Backs – Rair Foundation 😡

CNN’s Dana Bash Assists Dem Chris Murphy in Blaming Trump for Brown University Mass Shooting – Twitchy

Netanyahu: Israel ‘Expects’ Global Crackdown on Anti-Semitism in Wake of Bondi Beach Shooting Info Liberation


The Documentary PBS Tried to Hide: Real Warriors. Real Footage. Real Heroes. – Rumble Vid at Choice


Fast clips

Respect – We need more of it. Grown ass man taking accountability – Rumble

Shaq Reveals Surprising Anti-Aging ‘Beauty Secret’ (Exclusive) – 1 min 44 secs

This man can climb. Bro climbs like a goat lol – Rumble

Barry Manilow Does “Jingle Bells” VERY DIFFERENTLY! – 3 mins 38 secs

Do you know how Trees turn into paper… check out fast clip – Rumble

Prediction Market pros are starting to make big money – 1 min 55 sec clip 

You Can Beat Anyone Like This – 21 sec clip – Whatfinger

Drone strike scatters journalists and rescuers in Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia – 26 sec clip

Pay 0% interest until 2027 and tell Visa to kiss your balanced backside. Because nothing says freedom like watching minimum payments shrink faster than CNN’s ratings. → Sponsored 

Humor-Satire: SUNDAY FUNNIES – Burning Platform Blog

Humor-Satire: Sunday Funnies — 12/14/25 Pop says hey – Ken Smith – Substack

Humor-Satire: Meme Wars — 12/14/25 Priscilla said maybe – Ken Smith – Substack

Humor-Satire – The Week In Pictures: It’s Beginning to Look a Lot Like Christmas Edition – Powerline Blog

Latest Posts

Watch MAGA made this Whatfinger commercial, pretty cool huh!