The data is out and it looks like MAGA was right about Justice Amy Coney Barrett. She’s also the conservative ‘least likely to support Trump’ in cases that involve the president himself What an ungrateful, Ivory Tower weakling – DC Draino – this is his post on her – see it all – – – – – – BUUUUTTTT – we looked into the actual votes – – – and what we found….see below DC Draino’s screenshot….
KNOW THE TRUTH MAGA – do not fall for anything incorrect – I love DC Draino and we post his stuff often, but facts do not agree with him. Where are the facts on this justice: The claim that Justice Amy Coney Barrett now sides with the Left more than Conservatives is not supported by the data or her judicial record. Here are the key points:
Judicial Philosophy: Justice Barrett is known for her originalist and textualist approach to interpreting the Constitution and laws, aligning with conservative judicial philosophy. This approach emphasizes the text of the law and the original intent of the framers, which is typically associated with conservative jurisprudence.
Voting Patterns: An analysis of her decisions on the Supreme Court does not indicate a shift towards siding with the Left. For instance, in the 2023-2024 term, she was part of the majority in several high-profile cases that upheld conservative positions, such as the overturning of Chevron deference in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which limited regulatory power and was a significant win for conservative legal theory.
Specific Cases: In cases like Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade, Barrett was in the majority, aligning with conservative justices. Her dissent in United States v. Texas, where she argued against the majority’s decision to allow the Biden administration to end the “Remain in Mexico” policy, further illustrates her conservative stance on immigration and executive power.
Public Perception vs. Reality: The perception that she sides with the Left more often may stem from specific decisions where she has joined liberal justices, such as in certain procedural or technical aspects of cases. However, these instances do not constitute a pattern of shifting allegiance. For example, her concurrence in Biden v. Nebraska, where she agreed with the outcome but for different reasons, was misinterpreted by some as a deviation from conservative principles, but it was more about procedural grounds rather than substantive policy.
Recent Developments: There is no recent data or significant shift in her judicial decisions that would support the claim that she now sides with the Left more than Conservatives. Her record remains consistent with her originalist and textualist approach.
If anyone has any actual facts on her judgements – PLEASE email us at whatfinger@proton.me – Mal Antoni
Great Britain is now an Islamic Dictatorship – completely conquered and diseased. If you are White you will be a victim, and police will help the abusers.
For HOURS of fun – see many more Steve Inman as well as other humor, quick smile clips , more – Whatfinger’s collection – click here
- Is Ivermectin the Key to Fighting Cancer? People are being cured all over the world…. – Wellness (Dr. McCullough’s company) Sponsored Post 🛑 You can get MEBENDAZOLE and Ivermectin from Wellness 👍
- Be prepared for anything, including lockdowns with your own Emergency Med kit – see Wellness Emergency Kit (includes Ivermectin and other essential drugs, guide book, much more… peace of mind for you and your family) 🛑 – Dr. McCullough’s company! – Sponsor
- How can you move your 401K to Gold penalty free? Get the answer and more with Goldco’s exclusive Gold IRA Beginner’s Guide. Click here now! – Goldco
CLICK HERE FOR COMMENTS