If this data is accurate, now we know at least one way the last election was rigged, as well as how the upcoming one will be rigged. Add to this the witness accounts of pristine ballots (alleged fakes) in Pennsylvania that are being blocked from audit, and you have a full explanation of 2020. Courts have different standards than I do for determining truth. For me, if you don’t unlock the door to audit the suspicious ballots, even after a court audit, I take that as confirmation of wrongdoing. If this UOCAVA data is accurate, I can say with confidence the 2020 election was rigged in at least two easily observable ways. Note to Democrats: Courts are not a method for discovering election fraud. The courts can’t even get a closet unlocked, much less audit foreign votes. Courts also can’t rule on any cyber hacks that have not been detected. – Scott Adams
This UOCAVA vote loophole is particularly pernicious. 2020 was the trial run – they submitted 2244% more overseas ballots in Iowa in 2020 than were submitted in 2016. In Fulton County they didn’t even try to hide it – filling out 100% of the overseas ballots for Biden.
This UOCAVA vote loophole is particularly pernicious. 2020 was the trial run – they submitted 2244% more overseas ballots in Iowa in 2020 than were submitted in 2016. In Fulton County they didn’t even try to hide it – filling out 100% of the overseas ballots for Biden. pic.twitter.com/oCxuAiJPDO
— @amuse (@amuse) October 4, 2024
- If such a loophole exists why don’t republicans use it to make sure Texas is always RED? Do democrats have a monopoly on fraud?
